<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ryan Adams &amp; The Cardinals :: Cardinology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/</link>
	<description>Los Angeles Based MP3 &#38; Music Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edzep54</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-617363</link>
		<dc:creator>Edzep54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-617363</guid>
		<description>Appreciate where most of the comments are coming from, but my critical objectivity is generally suspended for Mr. Adams - I enjoy Cardinology as a collection by an extremely talented artist/group and don&#039;t feel the need to qualify it against any of his previous output.    This album is a creeper and if any of the above &#039;so-so effort&#039; comments were posted in the first week of listening, may I suggest putting it on the shelf and coming back in a month?

Even the songs I&#039;m not wild about have moments that save them from the skip button in most cases - on this CD and overall.

No stand-out tracks?  &#039;Cobwebs&#039;  although too short for my liking, is sublime.   &#039;Crossed Out Name&#039; - beautiful and sad - what&#039;s not to like?

Also,  to the person commenting that Jacksonville City Nights is &#039;overlooked&#039;. I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself.  Solid, solid stuff!

Disclaimer:  I like Ryan Adams&#039; music very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate where most of the comments are coming from, but my critical objectivity is generally suspended for Mr. Adams &#8211; I enjoy Cardinology as a collection by an extremely talented artist/group and don&#8217;t feel the need to qualify it against any of his previous output.    This album is a creeper and if any of the above &#8216;so-so effort&#8217; comments were posted in the first week of listening, may I suggest putting it on the shelf and coming back in a month?</p>
<p>Even the songs I&#8217;m not wild about have moments that save them from the skip button in most cases &#8211; on this CD and overall.</p>
<p>No stand-out tracks?  &#8216;Cobwebs&#8217;  although too short for my liking, is sublime.   &#8216;Crossed Out Name&#8217; &#8211; beautiful and sad &#8211; what&#8217;s not to like?</p>
<p>Also,  to the person commenting that Jacksonville City Nights is &#8216;overlooked&#8217;. I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.  Solid, solid stuff!</p>
<p>Disclaimer:  I like Ryan Adams&#8217; music very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-588118</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-588118</guid>
		<description>I saw The Cardinals play Cambridge, England last week and the 7 Cardinology tracks sounded great live (surprisingly Magick wasn&#039;t played)- but were different from the album versions - the band sounded quite like U2 circa &#039;Vertigo&#039;! The highlights were tracks from Cold Roses and Easy Tiger - in particular &#039;Goodnight Rose&#039; which got the Grateful Dead &#039;10 minute guitar jam&#039; treatment and went down really well with the old hippies in the audience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw The Cardinals play Cambridge, England last week and the 7 Cardinology tracks sounded great live (surprisingly Magick wasn&#8217;t played)- but were different from the album versions &#8211; the band sounded quite like U2 circa &#8216;Vertigo&#8217;! The highlights were tracks from Cold Roses and Easy Tiger &#8211; in particular &#8216;Goodnight Rose&#8217; which got the Grateful Dead &#8217;10 minute guitar jam&#8217; treatment and went down really well with the old hippies in the audience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-570750</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-570750</guid>
		<description>i saw them on halloween at the apollo theater and they were nothing short of mind bending. they played every song off &quot;cardinology&quot; and it prompted to me to swing by the record shop and get it the next day. it&#039;s not my favorite of his (that would be either cold roses or jacksonville city nights) but it&#039;s one of my favorites of 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i saw them on halloween at the apollo theater and they were nothing short of mind bending. they played every song off &#8220;cardinology&#8221; and it prompted to me to swing by the record shop and get it the next day. it&#8217;s not my favorite of his (that would be either cold roses or jacksonville city nights) but it&#8217;s one of my favorites of 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Oldbadleg</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-570419</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Oldbadleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-570419</guid>
		<description>It seems to me ALL Ryan Adams albums fall flat compared to his concert performances...I know...apples and oranges.  He&#039;s a real tweeky guy who has the same problem with studio work that The GD had.  They have to tweek it until it&#039;s perfect, but it ends up rather anemic.  Then they get on stage and breath life into the tunes and you remember why you love them so much.  
http://www.archive.org/details/RyanAdams
http://www.ryanadamsarchive.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me ALL Ryan Adams albums fall flat compared to his concert performances&#8230;I know&#8230;apples and oranges.  He&#8217;s a real tweeky guy who has the same problem with studio work that The GD had.  They have to tweek it until it&#8217;s perfect, but it ends up rather anemic.  Then they get on stage and breath life into the tunes and you remember why you love them so much.<br />
<a href="http://www.archive.org/details/RyanAdams" rel="nofollow">http://www.archive.org/details/RyanAdams</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ryanadamsarchive.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ryanadamsarchive.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-566943</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-566943</guid>
		<description>Alright, if I had to nail it all down, I&#039;d say Cardinology is cohesive and homogenous the same way Easy Tiger was.  I would also say that Cold Roses and Jacksonville City Nights had the same elements of cohesiveness in their style, but to a different degree, and much different style.  The one difference I find between Cardinology and those other three, however, is that the first three sounded one way on the album, but were *freaking amazing* live.  While I don&#039;t think Cardinology is &quot;freaking amazing,&quot; I do think it&#039;s their first album to capture a lot of the style and emotion and sound that the band features in a live setting.  From that perspective, I think it&#039;s the most indicative of the &quot;Cardinals sound.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, if I had to nail it all down, I&#8217;d say Cardinology is cohesive and homogenous the same way Easy Tiger was.  I would also say that Cold Roses and Jacksonville City Nights had the same elements of cohesiveness in their style, but to a different degree, and much different style.  The one difference I find between Cardinology and those other three, however, is that the first three sounded one way on the album, but were *freaking amazing* live.  While I don&#8217;t think Cardinology is &#8220;freaking amazing,&#8221; I do think it&#8217;s their first album to capture a lot of the style and emotion and sound that the band features in a live setting.  From that perspective, I think it&#8217;s the most indicative of the &#8220;Cardinals sound.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-566644</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-566644</guid>
		<description>Picked up Cardinology yesterday so still feeling it out, but it seems like a first cousin to Easy Tiger, which is kinda a good thing. I thought it was a solid album, but after seeing him live for the first time (Auckland, NZ - Aug 2007) I thought hell, why can&#039;t we get something like that on a record!
I had read a while back that Adams and company were looking to do an album that captured the live, jammy experience, so I was a little bummed to see Cardinology largely full of the sort of safe, solid slow burners that he seems averse to playing live (gig I saw on the Easy Tiger tour only featured one ET track). 
As far as standout tracks off recent albums, I think &#039;I Taught Myself...&#039; and &#039;Strawberry Wine&#039; are head and shoulders above anything else from their respective lps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picked up Cardinology yesterday so still feeling it out, but it seems like a first cousin to Easy Tiger, which is kinda a good thing. I thought it was a solid album, but after seeing him live for the first time (Auckland, NZ &#8211; Aug 2007) I thought hell, why can&#8217;t we get something like that on a record!<br />
I had read a while back that Adams and company were looking to do an album that captured the live, jammy experience, so I was a little bummed to see Cardinology largely full of the sort of safe, solid slow burners that he seems averse to playing live (gig I saw on the Easy Tiger tour only featured one ET track).<br />
As far as standout tracks off recent albums, I think &#8216;I Taught Myself&#8230;&#8217; and &#8216;Strawberry Wine&#8217; are head and shoulders above anything else from their respective lps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j. neas</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-566503</link>
		<dc:creator>j. neas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-566503</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s undoubtedly fascinating, and amusing, that an artist as divisive as Adams - and by this I mean people who just plain like/dislike him - can also inspire that kind of division in opinion amongst the people who share a like for him.  I, personally, just never got into Easy Tiger.  Which is not to say it&#039;s a bad record, but that in comparison to the rest of his oeuvre it&#039;s a bit stiff and I have found myself listening to it exactly none in the last year.  

If this helps gauge whether you agree with me or not, here are my personal favorite non-Whiskeytown Adams records: Heartbreaker, Love is Hell, Cold Roses, 29.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s undoubtedly fascinating, and amusing, that an artist as divisive as Adams &#8211; and by this I mean people who just plain like/dislike him &#8211; can also inspire that kind of division in opinion amongst the people who share a like for him.  I, personally, just never got into Easy Tiger.  Which is not to say it&#8217;s a bad record, but that in comparison to the rest of his oeuvre it&#8217;s a bit stiff and I have found myself listening to it exactly none in the last year.  </p>
<p>If this helps gauge whether you agree with me or not, here are my personal favorite non-Whiskeytown Adams records: Heartbreaker, Love is Hell, Cold Roses, 29.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Adams and the Cardinals - Cardinology &#124; youarekillingme.net</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-566418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Adams and the Cardinals - Cardinology &#124; youarekillingme.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-566418</guid>
		<description>[...] Review at Aquarium Drunkard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review at Aquarium Drunkard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Culture Bully</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-566404</link>
		<dc:creator>Culture Bully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-566404</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t hear it... it&#039;s consistent, but so very bland. Magick is a standout, and it&#039;s a fun, upbeat track - unfortunately I don&#039;t think it was meant to be one of the better songs on the album when they were recording it... but it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t hear it&#8230; it&#8217;s consistent, but so very bland. Magick is a standout, and it&#8217;s a fun, upbeat track &#8211; unfortunately I don&#8217;t think it was meant to be one of the better songs on the album when they were recording it&#8230; but it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-566378</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-566378</guid>
		<description>I agree that this album is homogeneous, but Easy Tiger had some standout tracks. I remember when &quot;Two&quot; was released and it was a bona fide single that got me really worked up for the album to be released.

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any excuse for Magick. That song is just horrible. Remove that, and you have a solid listen and a good album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this album is homogeneous, but Easy Tiger had some standout tracks. I remember when &#8220;Two&#8221; was released and it was a bona fide single that got me really worked up for the album to be released.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any excuse for Magick. That song is just horrible. Remove that, and you have a solid listen and a good album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-565690</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-565690</guid>
		<description>This album to me is really a 60/40 album.  It stars out very strong, but fizzles out.  Not really in a sense of music, but in a sense that I think Ryan might be losing touch on some of his metaphor making and lyrics in general.  As far as his output is concerned I feel like people are continuously overlooking &quot;Jacksonville City Nights.&quot;  Through and through its a solid country record with many stand out tracks in my mind.  &quot;Easy Tiger&quot; I think is better played live than on record.  In the live setting you see those songs evolve into something more.  Example: &quot;Halloween Head,&quot; &quot;Off Broadway,&quot; and &quot;I Taught Myself How to Grow Old.&quot;  And I believe the same will happen with &quot;Cardinology.&quot;  The not so strong cuts on this album will either evolve into something better or fade away.  This album doesn&#039;t diminish the prolific greatness of Ryan Adams, but only adds to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This album to me is really a 60/40 album.  It stars out very strong, but fizzles out.  Not really in a sense of music, but in a sense that I think Ryan might be losing touch on some of his metaphor making and lyrics in general.  As far as his output is concerned I feel like people are continuously overlooking &#8220;Jacksonville City Nights.&#8221;  Through and through its a solid country record with many stand out tracks in my mind.  &#8220;Easy Tiger&#8221; I think is better played live than on record.  In the live setting you see those songs evolve into something more.  Example: &#8220;Halloween Head,&#8221; &#8220;Off Broadway,&#8221; and &#8220;I Taught Myself How to Grow Old.&#8221;  And I believe the same will happen with &#8220;Cardinology.&#8221;  The not so strong cuts on this album will either evolve into something better or fade away.  This album doesn&#8217;t diminish the prolific greatness of Ryan Adams, but only adds to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-565590</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-565590</guid>
		<description>Easy Tiger was an extremely homogeneous, but solid effort. It was also his best since Cold Roses. Looking at the tracklist I can understand the want for a standout track, but every track on that album, save maybe Halloweenhead (goofy, cheezy a la Magick on this effort) is consistently good.

 With Cardinology, there is without a doubt some more diverse tracks, but with that come some of the duds that I think Easy Tiger didn&#039;t have. Tracks like Natural Ghost and Like Yesterday simply fall flat like most of the second half of the record does. (save for the brief jam on Like Yesterday). I think the strength of this album lies in Adams&#039; r&amp;b tones that are sometimes gospel-like, especially in the hooks of Born Into a Light, Go Easy, and Let Us Down Easy. Magick is a better rocker than Halloweenhead, though equally thoughtless and cheesy. 

Overall, I don&#039;t think Cardinology is a better album than Easy Tiger, but it does have some intriguing tracks, Let Us Down Easy being my personal favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy Tiger was an extremely homogeneous, but solid effort. It was also his best since Cold Roses. Looking at the tracklist I can understand the want for a standout track, but every track on that album, save maybe Halloweenhead (goofy, cheezy a la Magick on this effort) is consistently good.</p>
<p> With Cardinology, there is without a doubt some more diverse tracks, but with that come some of the duds that I think Easy Tiger didn&#8217;t have. Tracks like Natural Ghost and Like Yesterday simply fall flat like most of the second half of the record does. (save for the brief jam on Like Yesterday). I think the strength of this album lies in Adams&#8217; r&amp;b tones that are sometimes gospel-like, especially in the hooks of Born Into a Light, Go Easy, and Let Us Down Easy. Magick is a better rocker than Halloweenhead, though equally thoughtless and cheesy. </p>
<p>Overall, I don&#8217;t think Cardinology is a better album than Easy Tiger, but it does have some intriguing tracks, Let Us Down Easy being my personal favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theMike</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-565555</link>
		<dc:creator>theMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-565555</guid>
		<description>will definitely be picking this one up!

(128kbps blargh :P)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will definitely be picking this one up!</p>
<p>(128kbps blargh <img src='http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/comment-page-1/#comment-565433</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aquariumdrunkard.com/2008/11/03/ryan-adams-the-cardinals-cardinology/#comment-565433</guid>
		<description>Easy Tiger was probably in my top 10 last year, and Goodnight Rose was definitely one of my favorite songs of the year.  If that isn&#039;t a stand out I don&#039;t know what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy Tiger was probably in my top 10 last year, and Goodnight Rose was definitely one of my favorite songs of the year.  If that isn&#8217;t a stand out I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
