Foxygen-We-Are-The-21st-Century-Ambassadors-of-Peace-and-Magic-001-640x640No one will accuse Foxygen’s We Are The 21st Century Ambassadors of Peace and Magic of being a concept album. It’s as stylistically diverse, maddening and confident as the Take The Kids Off Broadway EP, yet feels ready to enter the primetime — a band confident that their set of skills will be accepted, or at least tolerated. This is in part thanks to the deft production of Richard Swift, whose hand truly feels like a contribution rather than a contraption. Sonically, the music is still confounding, still prone to fits of vibing followed by un-fettered freakouts. And with Foxygen there always seems to be a nod and a wink with every riff and turn. Sam France’s manic vocal delivery, something like a man alternating between 103 degree fever dreams and a case of the chills, meanders mercurially throughout the record, with multi-instrumentalist Jonathan Rado accentuating his most fanciful moments. And it’s this, Rado’s own ability to genre-hop moment-to-moment, that remains one of the bands hallmarks and is as defining as France’s howls of poetry.

Foxygen’s latest work continues to build atop the pop foundations sewn into each of their previous releases. Yet with 21st Century Ambassadors, the time has come to stop pitting their songs against past-genres and just allow the band to revel in the glammed-out bliss of “Shuggie”, alongside “San Francisco”‘s Velvety laze, and whatever “Oh Yeah” is smoking. A bouillabaisse this is.

Two previous songs get new treatments on 21st Century Ambassadors. First up is “No Destruction,” whose original form now feels like a demo if not for the fact that it stood so well on its own. The reworking adds to the jangly qualities of the tune, but where the original feels like France is delivering a feverish burst of emotions backed by his devilish and whirling cohorts, the new jam has him instead exuding the front-man confidence he often channels live, a simmering mix of suave and bombast. Everything is polished, every sound that each version shares feels smoother, mic’d right, and played until the right take emerged.

The same is true for title track, “We Are The 21st Century Ambassadors of Peace and Music.” It’s a stretch to call anything that sounds or reads like this “polished” but it’s certainly the updated version of its earlier, more primitive, brother. The original feels like a moment captured in time, France seems exhausted by the end, Rado hardly able to keep up with the changes he demands of himself. Now its like an eternal submission, the kind of de-camped Space Government-in-Exile brand of nonchalance the band cultivates – peaceful at one moment, on the war path the next.

This doesn’t mean anything is lost, nor does it mean there is a superiority to any phase of the bands evolution – but if somewhere down the line some future teenage-alien snobs wanna fight over versions of the wild stylistic swings of Foxygen’s career, 21st Century Ambassadors is fodder for the flames. That, and space drugs. words/ b kramer

MP3: Foxygen :: Shuggie

Related: (Catching Up With ) Foxygen :: The Aquarium Drunkard Interview

5 Responses to “We Are The 21st Century Ambassadors Of Peace And Magic”

  1. Great album!

  2. [...] “It’s as stylistically diverse, maddening and confident as the Take The Kids Off Broadway EP, yet feels ready to enter the primetime — a band confident that their set of skills will be accepted, or at least tolerated.” – Aquarium Drunkard [...]

  3. Do you get that misty-eyed proud dad feeling for these guys today? AD was the first place that gave them major love, huh?

  4. I’ve been listening to Foxygen. It’s good. I’m enjoying it. Yet – and I really don’t mean to be a downer – every time I listen, I feel a twinge of disdain.

    Is it done well? Sure! The production is fantastic, and the songwriting is pleasingly complicated, yet catchy enough to appeal to a broad range of modern music fans with “good taste”. Call these guys “A students” in careful study and well-done recreation of garage-y 60’s sounds/songwriting (see also: Ty Segall).

    But where are the risks? Where’s the creativity? I don’t mean to pick on Foxygen; this is just another album in a long line of what’s getting hot press these days. It’s not a bad thing to have more of the same ole good stuff. It’s a safe place to work from, and a safe place to blog from.

    Yet ever time I listen, as much as I like it, I’m just…..I don’t know! For god’s sake; give me something new!!! Something creative!! I’m certain I’m not alone in this sentiment; I’ve experienced/overheard countless conversations with my peers about this very issue. The current (my) generation’s inevitable legacy as a recyclist culture is more than a little embarrassing. I get that people are rifling through the internet; studying their dad’s record collection; pining endlessly for the 60’s, and I suppose it’s nice to sit in a safe, comfortable spot to make music from and blog from. But this obsession with things of a certain sound that feel like they were made ~50 years ago is becoming tiresome.

    I’ll listen to it, enjoy it, and respect the study/effort. Fine, it’s good. But am I challenged? Is my brain tickled? Hardly.

  5. Long version:
    I’m with Jesse on this one. I can see why people like it, it’s well executed and produced. But it does feel “studied” for lack of a better word. Unoriginal might be another. The chum bucket of 60’s rehash is starting to feel so full these days that I’d rather just go back to the source material. It’s better and feels more honest. There’s a distance, a blase-ness, a simulated suave coolness to a lot of these albums that I can’t get past. It just feels unauthentic and merely a simulacrum of 60s early 70s rock – the audio version of the 12 year old me with a crappy guitar pretending to be a rock star.

    Short version: The 60’s and 70’s called – they want their b-sides back.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>